In the Matter of Application of Jackman
Supreme Court of New Jersey
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
LaVECCHIA, J.
This Court issued an Order to Show Cause why Steven B. Jackman’s admission to the bar should not be withheld for failure to meet the requirements of good character and fitness for admission. In its Report and Recommendation, a Regulation (“RG.”) 303 Panel of the Committee on Character found that Jackman had been engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in New Jersey from August 1991 until April 1998 when he was employed as a Senior Associate at the law firm of Sills Cummis Radin Tischman Epstein & Gross, P.A., without a license to…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- In Re PennicaSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1962
- Birbrower, Montalbano, Condon & Frank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- Application of MatthewsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Kennedy v. Bar Ass'n of Montgomery County, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1989
- Appell v. ReinerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1964
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Bilazzo v. Portfolio Recovery Associates, LLCDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2012
- In re Virgin Islands Bar Ass'n CommitteeSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2013
- Milo Fields Trust v. BritzNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2005
- In re the Motion to Permit & Authorize MotylinskiSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2014
- Coyle v. Board of Chosen FreeholdersNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.