Legal Opinion
In Re COLEMAN
United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky
Decided January 31, 1980No. 19-30575PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MERRITT S. DEITZ, Jr., Bankruptcy Judge.
We are called upon for the first time to measure a tendered Chapter 13 petition against the requirements of the Bankruptcy Reform Act. Substantial compliance will, of course, result in the plan being confirmed; failure of compliance will bring about a denial of confirmation.
The petition of Theresa Virginia Coleman lists ten unsecured creditors owed a total of $4,845. Her plan proposes to pay them $1 each, or a total of $10.
Two secured creditors are listed. They are the Kissel Company, whose debt of $6,200 is secured by a first…
2Cited by17 opinions
- In Re SimpkinsUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1982
- Di Pierro v. Cullen (In Re Taddeo)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- Matter of LaPagliaUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
- In Re HeardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1980
- Central Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. King (In Re King)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.