Legal Opinion

Sears v. Doty

Superior Court of Delaware

Decided October 13, 1952No. 273PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Carey, J.:

Superior Court Rule 30(h) is copied from a local rule adopted by certain Federal District Courts. It provides:

“In the case of a proposed deposition upon oral examination at a place more than 150 miles from the Court House, the court may order or impose as a condition of denying a motion to vacate notice thereof, that the applicant shall pay the expense of the attendance of one attorney for the adversary party or parties, at the place where the deposition is to be taken, including a reasonable counsel fee, which amounts shall be paid or secured prior to such examination. The amount…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gibson v. International Freighting CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1949
  2. Empire Box Corp. of Stroudsburg v. Illinois Cereal MillsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1952
  3. Empire Box Corp. of Stroudsburg v. Illinois Cereal Mills, Inc.Superior Court of Delaware · 1952

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963
  2. Madison v. Travelers Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1975
  3. Daly v. HemphillSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API