Legal Opinion · Dissent

Baker v. Exxon Mobile Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 22, 2007No. 04-35182, 04-35183Published

1DissentBrowning, Circuit Judge

Because I believe the punitive damages award in this case is not “grossly excessive,” I would affirm. In reviewing the size of a punitive damages award, our sole duty is to ensure its imposition does not violate due process. Where an award lies within the bounds of due process, as this one does, we may not substitute a figure we consider more reasonable for one fairly awarded by a jury and properly reviewed by a district court. Therefore, I respectfully dissent.

1. Due Process Review of Punitive Damages

To comport with the Constitution, a punitive damages award must strike the proper balance…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. BMW of North America, Inc. v. GoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  2. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. HaslipSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  4. Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Leatherman Tool Group, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
  5. TXO Production Corp. v. Alliance Resources Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API