Legal Opinion

Bunnel v. Pinto

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 15, 1818PublishedCited by 9 opinions

in error. THIS was an action of book debt, brought by Bmnel against Pinto. The defendant pleaded in bar, that since the plaintiff’s account accrued, the parties mutually submitted their respective accounts to the award of Ward Mxvater and Horace Beach, with power to appoint an umpire, by a written submission, in these words ; “ We the subscribers, having a difficulty in settling our accounts, and being unwilling to have it decided by a course of law, have agreed, and do…

Read the full summary

in error. THIS was an action of book debt, brought by Bmnel against Pinto. The defendant pleaded in bar, that since the plaintiff’s account accrued, the parties mutually submitted their respective accounts to the award of Ward Mxvater and Horace Beach, with power to appoint an umpire, by a written submission, in these words ; “ We the subscribers, having a difficulty in settling our accounts, and being unwilling to have it decided by a course of law, have agreed, and do hereby agree, to leave our respective accounts with Ward Jlixua-ter and Horace Beach, and their decision thereon, in case…

1Opinion of the Court

Swift, Ch. J.

In this case, it appears, that the parties made a submission of their respective accounts, which were awarded upon. The plaintiff, in this action on book, claims, that he has a right to recover for certain articles charged on book, which accrued before the submission, but which were not actually laid before the arbitrators and awarded upon. It is clear, that the word <⅛ accounts” will include all book accounts, so that the question is, whether, when a man has made a submission which will comprehend book accounts, he can exhibit to the arbitrators a part of his books to be…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Webster v. LeeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1809

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. South & North Alabama Railroad v. Henlein & BarrSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  2. Oliver v. HoltSupreme Court of Alabama · 1847
  3. Stickel v. SteelMichigan Supreme Court · 1879
  4. Curley v. DeanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1822
  5. Goddard v. SeldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1829

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API