Cimato Bros. v. Town of Pendleton
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously reversed on the law without costs and motion denied. Memorandum: Supreme Court erred in granting plaintiffs motion for summary judgment declaring unconstitutional that portion of the 1989 amendment to the Public Improvement Project Ordinance of defendant Town of Pendleton (Town) establishing a fee for the Town’s cost of providing inspection services with respect to the construction of public improvements. In order to succeed on its motion, plaintiff was required to establish beyond a reasonable doubt that there is *696no reasonable basis for the amended fee structure (see, Town…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Alvarez v. Prospect HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Winegrad v. New York University Medical CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Walsh v. Staten Island Obstetrics & Gynecology Associates, P.C.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Doe v. RoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- Town of North Hempstead v. Exxon Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Cimato Bros. v. Town of PendletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998