Grimm v. Barrington
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. D. D. Fisher, Judge. (1) The facts alleged show a liability on the part of garnishee for the services rendered, which plaintiff might enforce against her directly in an action on an implied contract. Painter v. Ritchie, 43 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from St. Louis City Circuit Court. — Hon. D. D. Fisher, Judge. (1) The facts alleged show a liability on the part of garnishee for the services rendered, which plaintiff might enforce against her directly in an action on an implied contract. Painter v. Ritchie, 43 Mo. App-. Ill; Jackson v. Clopton, 66 Ala. 29. (2) Moreover, plaintiff had a lien upon the policy, receipts and other papers in his custody for his services, and was wrongfully deprived of his lien by garnishee. People v. Pack, 115 Mich. 669; Massachusetts v. Gillis, 48 Fed. 145; Harwood v. LaGrange, 139 N. Y. 540; Smith v.…
1Opinion of the CourtGoode, J.
On July 5, 1898, appellant commenced Ms suit by attachment, in the St. Louis circuit court, against William F. Ryan, and on July 6, 1898, had respondent duly served as garnishee. The attachment was sustained and judgment was rendered in appellant’s favor, on February 25, 1901, against Ryan for $305.40. On October 4, 1898, interrogatories to the respondent were filed to which she filed answer denying any indebtedness to Ryan. An amended denial and a reply thereto were subsequently filed. The facts, as developed at the trial on the issues as made by the amended denial of appellant and the reply…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Och v. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Wells v. Covenant Mutual Benefit Ass'nSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Knapp v. Publishers George Knapp & Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Thompson v. CohenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- Barrington v. RyanMissouri Court of Appeals · 1901
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.