Glinton v. AND R, INC.
Supreme Court of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Thompson, Justice.
Plaintiffs borrowed money from Georgia pawnbrokers at interest rates which exceeded five percent per month. Asserting the transac*865tions were illegal and void because they violated the criminal usury statute, OCGA § 7-4-18,1 plaintiffs brought suit against the pawnbrokers in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia. The pawnbrokers moved to dismiss the complaint on the ground that the transactions are controlled by the statute regulating pawnbrokers, OCGA § 44-12-131, not the criminal usury statute. The district court agreed with the pawnbrokers…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Georgia Mental Health Institute v. BradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Fleet Finance, Inc. v. JonesSupreme Court of Georgia · 1993
- Copeland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
3Cited by29 opinions
- Wadkins v. SmallwoodCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000
- Mitchum v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Bellsouth Telecomms., LLC v. Cobb Cnty.Supreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- BELLSOUTH TELECOMMUNICATIONS, LLC v. COBB COUNTYSupreme Court of Georgia · 2019
- Lord v. LoweCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.