Legal Opinion

McCabe v. Hunt

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 15, 1903Published

Motion to continue an injunction pendente lite.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

In this action, although all the parties named are not the same as in the action of Hunt v. McCabe, in which a decision is handed down herewith (40 Misc. Rep. 461), the controversy arises out of the same transactions. James F. McCabe, the plaintiff herein, is the principal defendant in the other action, brought by Rufus C. Hunt, one of the defendants herein. For the purpose of this decision, which, in view of all the circumstances, we feel constrained to render somewhat hurriedly, we refer to the statement of facts in the decision in the Hunt case. This motion is to continue an injunction,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Hunt v. McCabeNew York Supreme Court · 1903

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API