People v. Verrilli
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The hearing court properly denied that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress certain statements he made to law enforcement officials because a reasonable person, innocent of any crime, would not have believed that he was in custody at the time the defendant made those statements (see People v Yukl, 25 NY2d 585, 589 [1969], cert denied 400 US 851 [1970]; People v Watson, 17 AD3d 385 [2005]; People v Parsad, 243 AD2d 510 [1997], cert denied 540 US 1091 [2003]).
The defendant’s contention that the evidence of guilt was legally insufficient because the People failed to…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. RomeroNew York Court of Appeals · 2006
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. McDanielNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Matott v. WardNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- People v. LashwayAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- People v. SmithAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- People v. WyreAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. BrownAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. KurthAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.