Legal Opinion

Marsh v. Bennett

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1903PublishedCited by 2 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Writ of error to the Circuit Court for Volusia county. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Per curiam

This cause coming on for final adjudication before Division A of the court upon the transcript of the record and briefs of counsel for the respective parties, upon due consideration the court finds that there was no final judgment rendered in said cause from which writ of error would lie, and it is, therefore, hereby considered, ordered and adjudged that the writ of error in said cause be, and the same is hereby, dismissed at the cost of the plaintiff in error. Harrison v. Thurston, 11 Fla. 307; Gates v. Hayner, 22 Fla. 325; Ropes v. Eldridge, 39 Fla. 47, 21. South. Rep. 570.

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Gates v. HaynerSupreme Court of Florida · 1886
  2. Harrison v. ThurstonSupreme Court of Florida · 1867
  3. Ropes v. EldridgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1897

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Marsh v. BennettSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
  2. Morrison v. McCaskillSupreme Court of Florida · 1903