U.S.A. Ex Rel. Johnson v. Lane
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.
Before the court are petitioner’s and respondent’s motions for summary judgment on petitioner’s amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons set forth below, respondent’s motion is granted and petitioner’s motion is denied.
The petitioner seeks habeas relief on two grounds: (1) that the state courts improperly refused to suppress evidence flowing from a custodial interrogation of petitioner before he was given Miranda warnings, thereby violating his rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments;…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- David Jarrell v. Charles Balkcom, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
- Duddles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
- People v. EngertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
- United States ex rel. Bradley v. HartiganDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1985