Legal Opinion

U.S.A. Ex Rel. Johnson v. Lane

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided October 27, 1983No. 81 C 7082PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ROSZKOWSKI, District Judge.

Before the court are petitioner’s and respondent’s motions for summary judgment on petitioner’s amended petition for a writ of habeas corpus. Jurisdiction is based upon 28 U.S.C. § 2241. For the reasons set forth below, respondent’s motion is granted and petitioner’s motion is denied.

The petitioner seeks habeas relief on two grounds: (1) that the state courts improperly refused to suppress evidence flowing from a custodial interrogation of petitioner before he was given Miranda warnings, thereby violating his rights under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments;…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. Johnson v. ZerbstSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  3. Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  4. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Cuyler v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1980

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. David Jarrell v. Charles Balkcom, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1984
  2. Duddles v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2003
  3. People v. EngertCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1987
  4. United States ex rel. Bradley v. HartiganDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API