Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Sperrle

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 4, 1965PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Frank D. Paulo, S.

The decedent is survived by her husband and her two adult children. In her will she nominated her son, Erwin, and her daughter, Gladys, as her executors.

Erwin has filed objections to the competency of his sister to serve as executrix and Gladys, joined by her father, decedent’s widower, has filed objections to Erwin’s competency to serve as executor.

A nominated executor cannot lightly be denied letters testamentary. The court may not substitute its judgment for that of the testatrix. The grounds upon which the court may find a nominated executor incompetent to serve are set…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of LathamAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  2. Crowley v. CrowleyNew York Supreme Court · 1959

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Eastern Airlines, Inc. v. StuhlCivil Court of the City of New York · 1970
  2. O'BRIEN v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  3. In re the Estate of GiaimoNew York Surrogate's Court · 1972
  4. O'BRIEN v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969
  5. O'BRIEN v. Superior Court in and for Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1969

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API