Legal Opinion

Lutz v. Superintendent

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided October 22, 2001No. [H.C. No. 22, October Term, 1953.]Published

1Opinion of the Court 1

203 Md. 675 (1953)

100 A.2d 732

LUTZ

v.

SUPERINTENDENT OF SPRING GROVE STATE HOSPITAL

[H.C. No. 22, October Term, 1953.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided December 1, 1953.

Before SOBELOFF, C.J., DELAPLAINE, COLLINS, HENDERSON and HAMMOND, JJ.

2Opinion of the Court · HendersonHenderson, J.

This is an application for leave to appeal from a denial of a writ of habeas corpus. The record shows that petitioner was committed to Spring Grove Hospital on the medical certificates of two doctors. See Sections 1 and 30, Article 59, 1951 Code. Petitioner has had three sanity hearings in the past two years. See Section 20, Article 59, 1951 Code.…

3Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bailey v. Superintendent of Spring Grove State HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  2. Miller v. Superintendent of Spring Grove State HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1947
  3. Miller v. Superintendent of Spring Grove State HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1951
  4. Lutz v. Superintendent of Spring Grove State HospitalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API