Legal Opinion

Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. Line

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 18, 1929No. 235PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSwan, Circuit Judge

(after stating the facts as above). [1, 2] When a charter party is for a term of “about six months,” or other stated period, the use of the word “about” is interpreted as signifying an intention to allow the charterer a reasonable leeway in respect to the date on which the vessel shall be surrendered. It is a recognition, based on the necessities of practical business, that her voyages cannot be planned so accurately as to bring her home on an exact date, and that the parties have contemplated the possibility of a reasonable shortening or lengthening of the stated term. Hence, if a voyage…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Straits of Dover S. S. Co. v. MunsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1899
  2. Thor v. Tropical Fruit Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1922
  3. The RygjaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1908
  4. Trechmann S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. LineCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1913
  5. Anderson v. MunsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1900

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. In Re North Atlantic and Gulf Steamship CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1962
  2. Britain S. S. Co. v. Munson S. S. LineDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API