Haygood v. City of Marietta
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Felton, Chief Judge.
We think the petition set forth a cause of action against a general demurrer. Kesot v. City of Dalton, 94 Ga. App. 194 (94 SE2d 90), cited by the city, dealt with evidence, not pleading. The petition in this case alleges that the dirt strip on Which the mailbox is located was owned and operated by the city as a part of a public thoroughfare at the time of plaintiff's alleged injuries. This is an allegation of fact. It was not necessary for the plaintiff to allege how the city acquired title or ownership. The allegations are sufficient to charge the city with the duty to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City Council v. TharpeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1901
- Redding v. Sinclair Refining Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1962
- City of Atlanta v. HamptonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1913
- City of Atlanta v. MilamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1894
- McFarland v. City of McCaysvilleCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1929
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- City of Vidalia v. BrownCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1999
- Yeager v. JacobsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1965
- Sinclair Refining Co. v. ReddingCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1963