Legal Opinion

Broughton v. Millis

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 7, 1933No. 9880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LANE, Justice.

John F. Markham and Sarah Frances Markham, the Markhams' mentioned in the suits hereinafter mentioned, were married on the 24th day of October, 1S88. ’They had no child. During their married relations they amassed a community estate of the value of $79,653.29. Sarah Frances Markham was adjudged of unsound mind on the 30th day of July, 1909, and she has been ever since said date of unsound mind and was at the time of the trial of said suits an inmate and patient of Greenwood’s Sanitarium, one for the confinement and treatment of persons with mental disorders.

At the time of the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Avery v. JohnsonTexas Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Lasater v. RamirezTexas Commission of Appeals · 1919
  3. Byrn v. KleasCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897
  4. Gallagher v. RedmondTexas Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Broom v. PearsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Wright v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Price v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Hattle C. Broughton v. C. E. SettegastCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  4. in the Matter of the Estate of J.L. Beasley, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API