Legal Opinion

Brooks v. Wachovia Bank & Trust Co.

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided October 17, 1989No. 8818SC1407Published

1Opinion of the Court

COZORT, Judge.

This case presents a question of first impression in North Carolina: whether a lender who repossesses a car and transfers it to a dealer under a repurchase agreement is liable for the dealer’s failure to sell the car within ninety days of repossession as required by N.C. Gen. Stat. § 25-9-505(1). We hold that the lender is not liable.

On 19 November 1987 plaintiff Mary Brooks brought this action against defendants Wachovia and Gate City Motors alleging, among other things, that both were responsible for failing to sell her car within ninety days after it had been repossessed,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Community Manage. Ass'n of Colorado Sp. v. TousleyColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Allard v. Ford Motor Credit Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1980
  3. Stoppi v. Wilmington Trust Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  4. Joyce v. Clover-Brook Homes, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API