Legal Opinion

Opinion No. (1997)

Oklahoma Attorney General Reports

Decided September 15, 1997Published

1Opinion of the Court

Dear Senator Leftwich,

¶ 0 This office has received your letter asking for an official Opinion regarding the following question:

Does the language set forth in 70 O.S. 1991, § 509.3[70-509.3], mandating that "local board representatives shall be presently serving on the board or employed by said board and no other person shall represent the board," prohibit a local board of education from contracting with an independent contractor or other entity for the purpose of representing a local board of education in negotiations authorized under 70 O.S. 1991 and Supp. 1996, §§ 509.1-509.10?

NEGOTIATIONS…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Jackson v. Independent School District No. 16Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
  2. TXO Production Corp. v. Oklahoma Corp. CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
  3. Board of Education of Oklahoma City v. CloudmanSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1939
  4. Carlyle v. Independent School District No. I-71 of McCurtain CountyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API