Legal Opinion

Wilson v. Derrwaldt

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided January 30, 1902Published

Bill in Equity for Relief.—Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook County; the Hon. Richard S. Ththill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Adams

The sole contention of appellant is that the court erred in dismissing the bill while a demurrer was pending. The difficulty with this contention is, that the demurrer was not pending.

Appellee, by moving for leave to withdraw his demurrer and file an answer, which leave ivas granted, waived his demurrer and submitted to answer. Thereafter, the demurrer was not pending. This being the sole contention argued by appellant’s counsel, all other objections may be deemed waived. Keyes v. Kimmel, 186 Ill. 109; Gordon v. Commissioners, etc., 169 Ib. 510; Interstate B’g, etc., Ass’n, v. Ayres, 71 Ill.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Chicago Public Stock Exchange v. McClaughryIllinois Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Keyes v. KimmelIllinois Supreme Court · 1900
  3. Inter-State Building & Loan Ass'n v. AyersAppellate Court of Illinois · 1897
  4. Van Valkenburg v. Trustees of SchoolsIllinois Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Howell v. FosterIllinois Supreme Court · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API