Odom v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
George Rose Smith, Justice.
The appellant, a resident of Brinkley, was charged as an accessory before the fact in the robbery of the Mad Butcher grocery store at Brinkley. It was the State’s theory that Odom assisted three other men, Embrey, Bruton, and Zappas, in planning the robbery. The other three actually committed the crime, with Odom receiving $400 as his share. The jury returned a verdict of guilty and imposed sentences of ten years for the robbery and eight years for the use of a firearm.
Inasmuch as there is one clear-cut reversible error, we confine our discussion to that point and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
- Rogers v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Melton v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
- Peters v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1912
- Havens v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1950
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Mathis v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1980
- Hogue v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1996
- James v. StateCourt of Appeals of Arkansas · 1984
- Johnson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1976
- Thorne v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1981
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.