Legal Opinion

Arena v. Herman

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided June 5, 1996No. 95-3410PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

In September 1992, Annette Arena and Jack Herman entered into an agreement to settle their interests in the corporation, USA Knitting Mills. Their arrangement provided in part, that Arena would pay Herman $100,-000. That deal failed and in July 1993 the trial court entered an order on a new agreed settlement. . Under the July 1993 order, rather than pay cash, Arena would return enumerated pieces of equipment. Herman moved to enforce that order in May 1994, wherein he averred Arena had not returned a number of the listed items. Along with the order’s enforcement, Herman requested that *211the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Bowen v. BowenSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
  2. Pugliese v. PuglieseSupreme Court of Florida · 1977
  3. Jack Austin, D/B/A Jack Austin & Associates, Cross v. D. R. Parker and J. A. McAlpin D/B/A M&m Construction Co., CrossCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1982
  4. Rynveld v. DupuisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1930
  5. Fredericks v. SturgisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Clark v. ManningDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API