Legal Opinion
People v. Anderson
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 5, 1992PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant contends that the trial court erred in permitting complainant’s mother to testify on redirect examination that complainant stated that defendant had sexually assaulted her. We disagree. On direct examination, the prosecutor did not introduce testimony regarding what complainant had told her mother about the alleged sexual assault. On cross-examination, however, defense counsel elicited that complainant did not tell her mother that defendant "raped” her or "had sex” with her. On redirect, the prosecutor asked complainant’s mother to relate…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- People v. MelendezNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. ReginaNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
- People v. JacksonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by9 opinions
- People v. SwingerCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1998
- People v. LitzenbergerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
- People v. BurkeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. HegemanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- People v. WarrenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.