Legal Opinion

Tonseth v. Serwold

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 22, 1945No. 29413PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtSteinert, J.

Five members of a fishing crew] joining as plaintiffs, commenced this action against the operating owners of a fishing vessel to recover the balances of certain amounts alleged to be owing to the plaintiffs respectively as their shares of the net proceeds of a season’s catch of tima fish. The cause was tried to the court without a jury and resulted in a judgment dismissing the complaint with prejudice. The plaintiffs appealed.

At all times involved in this action, appellants, Paul H. Tonseth, Steen Alsos, Knut Skogen, Victor D. Neilsen, and Oscar Henslean, were fishermen and members of the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Graham v. New York Life InsuranceWashington Supreme Court · 1935
  2. Armstrong v. WheelerWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Dinsmore Sawmill Co. v. Falls City Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Poston v. Western Dairy Products Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Schulz v. Spokane United RailwaysWashington Supreme Court · 1942

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Keith Adams & Associates, Inc. v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1970

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API