Kruse v. Vail
Supreme Court of Iowa
1Opinion of the CourtHale, J.
Plaintiff, Frank W. Kruse, is the owner of one hundred sixty acres of land and Hugh L. Dye is the owner of eighty acres adjoining the north half of plaintiff’s land on the west. The fence in controversy is that running north and south on the west line of plaintiff’s land and the east line of Dye’s land. Defendants are the township trustees of Pleasant Grove township.
Apparently some dispute had arisen between the two adjoining landowners as to the portions of the line fence to be maintained by each. At any rate, plaintiff, Kruse, visited attorneys in Montezuma, who wrote Dye under date of July…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Sinnott v. District Court of Clarke CountySupreme Court of Iowa · 1926
- Cheshire v. McCoy & HenrySupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Osgood v. NamesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1921
- Scott v. NesperSupreme Court of Iowa · 1922
- Nichols v. FierceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Gates v. City Council of BloomfieldSupreme Court of Iowa · 1951
- Laughlin v. FrancSupreme Court of Iowa · 1955
- State v. SchlakSupreme Court of Iowa · 1962
- Jensen Ranch, Inc. v. MarsdenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989