Legal Opinion

Kehl v. Dunn

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to Houghton. (Hubbell, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the ■opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

This cause was tried before the court without n jury upon the following agreed facts: Plaintiff was the owner and in possession of a piano of the value of $200. *582The defendant, as sheriff, levied an execution in favor of Simon Karger upon the piano and other property belonging to plaintiff, and presented a list of the property so levied upon to the plaintiff, who then and there selected the piano as his exemption, under subdivision 7 of section 7686, How. Stat. At the time of the levy, plaintiff was a householder, living in Houghton with his family, consisting of himself and wife and four…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Dunlap v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
  2. Tanner v. BillingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Cook v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  2. Lamb v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API