Kehl v. Dunn
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Houghton. (Hubbell, J.) Replevin. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the ■opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.
This cause was tried before the court without n jury upon the following agreed facts: Plaintiff was the owner and in possession of a piano of the value of $200. *582The defendant, as sheriff, levied an execution in favor of Simon Karger upon the piano and other property belonging to plaintiff, and presented a list of the property so levied upon to the plaintiff, who then and there selected the piano as his exemption, under subdivision 7 of section 7686, How. Stat. At the time of the levy, plaintiff was a householder, living in Houghton with his family, consisting of himself and wife and four…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Dunlap v. EdgertonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1858
- Tanner v. BillingsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1864
3Cited by2 opinions
- Cook v. FullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lamb v. KingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1905