Kuhn v. Graves
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Hardin District Court. The material, facts are fully stated in tlie opinion of the Court. in support of their views, cited Code of 1851, sections 1193-95; Watson v. Williams, 4 Black. 26; Hawkins v. Ingalls lb. 35; Camp v. Camp, 2 Hill 628.
1Opinion of the CourtStockton, J.
Replevin for personal property. The plaintiffs make title under a bill of sale and conveyance from Zachariah Emmish, regularly acknowledged, certified and recorded. The defendant was a constable, and claimed the property by virtue of a levy and seizure under a writ of attachment issued by Ellis Parker, a justice of the peace of Hardin county, at the suit of Gf. M. Woodbury, against Z. Emmish & Brothers. He avers in his answer that he took the property from the possession and control of Z. Emmish & Bros, as their property, and denies that the plaintiffs owned the same, or any part thereof.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Allen v. McCallaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Fromme v. JonesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Poling v. FlanaganWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1895
- Maxwell v. BollesOregon Supreme Court · 1895
- Nicklin v. Betts Spring Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1884
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.