Legal Opinion

State v. Lankford, 07 Be 3 (6-12-2007)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided June 12, 2007No. 07 BE 3PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

{¶ 1} This matter comes for consideration upon the record in the trial court and the parties' briefs. Appellant, Derek Lankford, appeals the decision of the Belmont County Court of Common Pleas denying his post-sentence motion to withdraw his guilty plea. Because this claim could have been raised in one of his earlier appeals, it is barred by the doctrine of res judicata.

{¶ 2} On February 26, 1992, Lankford pled guilty to aggravated murder and the accompanying capital specification of R.C. 2929.04(A)(3). At the plea hearing in front of a three judge panel, the court engaged appellant…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  2. Grava v. Parkman TownshipOhio Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Rogers v. City of WhitehallOhio Supreme Court · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. McFarlandOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State v. WiseOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. State v. LusherOhio Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. State v. PerezOhio Court of Appeals · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API