Legal Opinion

Harrell v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 2, 1932No. 14987PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CALHOUN, Judge.

— The offense, murder; the punishment, death.

Bill of exception No. 1 relates to the remarks of the court to the jury on being advised that they were unable to agree upon a verdict. The bill shows that the following occurred: The jury, after deliberating about forty-two hours, reported to the court that they were hopelessly disagreed, and in answer to-the question of the court as to how they stood, they replied that they stood eleven to one. The court looked at his watch and instructed the jury as follows: “Gentlemen, you have ten hours of this day remaining and three weeks more…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lagrone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1919
  2. Golden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  3. Hughes v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Lopez v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1989
  2. Pullen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API