Heckman v. University of North Carolina

MEMORANDUM OPINION

BEATY, District Judge.

This action comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss [Document # 12] and Motion to Dismiss Amendment to the Complaint [Document #23], For the reasons stated herein, Defendant’s motions are granted and this action is dismissed in its entirety.

I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND.

This action arises out of a pro se Complaint filed by Plaintiff Charles W. Heckman against Defendant, the University of North Carolina (“UNO”) at Chapel Hill, on March 5, 1997. Plaintiff alleges that, by rejecting Plaintiffs application for employment, Defendant…