Oschepkova v. New York City Transit Authority

In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the defendant New York City Transit Authority appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Solomon, J.), dated November 17, 2004, which denied its motion for summary judgment dismissing the complaint insofar as asserted against it and granted the plaintiffs cross motion for leave to serve an amended notice of claim nunc pro tunc.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

General Municipal Law § 50-e (2) provides, in part, that a no*524tice of claim “shall set forth . . . the nature of the claim . . . [and] the time when, the…