Legal Opinion

Irizarry v. Office of General Counsel

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 2007PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION BY

Judge McGINLEY.

Enid Irizarry (Irizarry) appeals from a final order of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania General Counsel (General Counsel) that denied Irizarry’s application for payment of attorney’s fees and costs (Application) pursuant to 4 Pa.Code, Chapter 39. 1

The facts found by the General Counsel are as follows:

1. Irizarry is a former employee of the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Department of Driver Licensing (Department). (Official Notice; Application for Costs).

2. On or about August 3,1998, while an employee of the Department, Irizarry issued a duplicate commercial driver’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schubach v. SilverSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Witkowski v. WelchCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1999
  3. Rue v. K-Mart Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Dyer v. TravelersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  5. Pilgrim Food Products Co. v. Filler Products, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1958

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Balshy v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  2. Pennsylvania Board of Probation & Parole v. Pennsylvania Human Relations CommissionCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2013
  3. Day v. CIVIL SERVICE COM'N OF CARLISLECommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
  4. Balshy v. Pennsylvania State PoliceCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2010
  5. F. Kelly v. OGCCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2017

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API