Legal Opinion

Palomaki v. Assessors

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 24, 1984Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

D. Bruce Crew, III, J.

By separate petitions in these proceedings the petitioners seek a review of tax assessments levied on their respective properties in the Town of Van Etten, New York, for the years 1982 and 1983.

Initially, the court must deal with a legal issue before proceeding to the merits. Petitioners seek to preclude respondents from offering evidence of value of the subject premises through their assessor. Petitioners retained an appraiser for the purpose of appraising the subject property and thereafter filed their appraisal report with the Administrative Judge…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Jamaica Water Supply Co. v. State Board of Tax CommissionersNew York Court of Appeals · 1909
  2. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Katz Buffalo Realty, Inc. v. AndersonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1966
  4. National Fuel Gas Distribution Corp. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc. v. State Board of Equalization & AssessmentNew York Supreme Court · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API