Mosier v. Goodcell
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES, District Judge:
The suits as ab.ove entitled are to recover the amount of income tax as fixed by a deficiency assessment made by the Commissioner of Internal Revenue. They affect the taxable income of the plaintiff for the year 1917 only, and are separately brought because of payments made to the two defendants, Collector Welch having succeeded to the office formerly held by defendant Goodeell.
The question presented is solely as to whether, by reason of the limitation periods fixed by the several revenue acts which were operative in 1917 and 1918 and which became of effect prior to the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Stange v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Burnet v. Chicago Railway Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Aiken v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Liberty Baking Co. v. HeinerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1930
- W. P. Brown & Sons Lumber Co. v. BurnetSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- John Walsonavich, Individually and Trading as Service Electric Company v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1964
- United States v. HavnerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- United States v. Bank of Commerce & Trust Co.District Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1940
- General Lead Batteries Co. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1953
- R. H. Stearns Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.