Legal Opinion

Halpern v. Gozan

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 6, 1976PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLeonard Leigh Finz, J.

The issue raised in this medical malpractice action is whether subdivision 8 of section 148-a of the Judiciary Law (hereinafter referred to as the "new law”) signed into law on July 1, 1975 is violative of the Constitution. A determination of this question requires a brief review of the facts:

The plaintiff Marcia Halpern was a patient of the defendant doctor for 10 years, during which period the defendant, an *754obstetrician-gynecologist, delivered all four of the plaintiffs children. He also attended to the plaintiff at regular intervals for routine physical examinations. Concerning the instant…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. McGowan v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  2. Nebbia v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Munn v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  4. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. People v. BroadieNew York Court of Appeals · 1975

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Strykowski v. WilkieWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Eastin v. BroomfieldArizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Parker v. Children's Hospital of Phila.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  4. Comiskey v. ArlenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
  5. Beatty v. Akron City HospitalOhio Supreme Court · 1981

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API