Linardos v. Lilley

I respectfully dissent for the following reasons.

The appellee John E. Lilley claimed that he, his attorney and Mr. Lebedeker, the *1065appellants' attorney, met in the hallway of the judge’s chambers directly before a trial was scheduled at which the issue of a deficiency judgment would be resolved. The appellees’ attorney testified that Mr. Lebe-deker appeared without his clients and orally stipulated to the entry of a deficiency judgment in the amount of $86,280.97.

The appellant George Linardos, Jr., testified that he never authorized Mr. Lebedeker to agree to the entry of the deficiency…