El Paso Production Co. v. PWG PARTNERSHIP
New Mexico Supreme Court
1DissentFranchini, Justice
It is my opinion that Roseline Abraham never assigned, conveyed or divested herself in any manner of the option to repurchase; and that PWG never contracted or bargained for the option.
Assignment
Although it is not affirmatively stated, I conclude that the majority agrees that Texas law applies to the subject case. I view Prochemco in a different light than either the majority or the appellant. It seems to me that Prochemco, Inc. had a real property interest as the landowner (through its wholly-owned subsidiary) and a personal property interest as the holder of an option to extend the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Universal C. I. T. Credit Corp. v. DanielTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Magee v. PaulTexas Supreme Court · 1920
- Phillips Petroleum Co. v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- Hester v. SawyersNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1937
- OTC Petroleum Corp. v. Brock Exploration Corp., Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1992
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.