Legal Opinion

State v. Ashley

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided January 15, 1839PublishedCited by 20 opinions

MOTION for a rule to show cause wh~ an information in nature of a quo warranto, should not be filed. This was a motion made by the attorney for the state, for a rule against Chester Ashley, Roswell Beebe, Elijah A. More, Richard C. Byrd, James DeBaun, William W. Stevenson, and James L. Dawson, to show cause why an information in the nature of a writ of quo war-ranto should not be filed in this court against them, for intruding into, and holding without grant or wairant, the…

Read the full summary

MOTION for a rule to show cause wh~ an information in nature of a quo warranto, should not be filed. This was a motion made by the attorney for the state, for a rule against Chester Ashley, Roswell Beebe, Elijah A. More, Richard C. Byrd, James DeBaun, William W. Stevenson, and James L. Dawson, to show cause why an information in the nature of a writ of quo war-ranto should not be filed in this court against them, for intruding into, and holding without grant or wairant, the office of directors of the Principal Bank of the Real Estate Bank of this State. Chester Ashley, one of the acting…

1Opinion of the CourtRingo, Chief Justice

On a former day of the present term, the attorney for the state and cx-officio attorney general, upon the affidavits of Charles Rapley and William Cummins, then read and filed with the clerk, moved the court for a rule on Chester Ashley, Roswell Beebe, Elijah A. More, James DeBaun, Richard C. Byrd, William W. Stevenson, and James L. Dawson, to appear and show cause why an information in the nature of a quo warranto should not be filed against them, for usurping the office of directors of the principal bank of the Real Estate Bank of the State of Arkansas.

After the motion was made, and the…

2Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ames and Others v. State of Kansas Ex Rel. Johnston. Kansas Pac. Ry Co. v. SameSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. State ex rel. Young v. Village of KentSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1905
  3. State ex inf. Crow v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1903
  4. People ex rel. Kocourek v. City of Chicago & Schlesinger & MeyerIllinois Supreme Court · 1901
  5. Ames v. Kansas Ex Rel. JohnstonSupreme Court of the United States · 2010

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API