Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Ashcroft v. American Triad Land Co.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1986No. 50348PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SNYDER, Judge.

Intervenors appeal from the trial court judgment denying appellants’ motion to intervene pursuant to Rule 52.12(a). Appellants sought to intervene and set aside specific portions of a “Stipulation for Consent Injunction” entered into between plaintiff-respondent State of Missouri and defendants-respondents land developers. Appellants insist they should have been permitted to intervene as a matter of right under Rule 52.12(a). The judgment is affirmed.

Appellants are the elected trustees of a subdivision in which they own residential property in the Goose Creek Development of St.…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Reser v. MartinSupreme Court of Missouri · 1978
  2. Model Housing & Development Corp. v. Collector of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 1979

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Whitehead v. Lakeside Hospital Ass'nMissouri Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Frost v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1991
  3. Frost v. WhiteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989
  4. Emrick v. American Casualty Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  5. State ex rel. Clinton Area Vocational School v. DandurandMissouri Court of Appeals · 1989

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API