Legal Opinion

Lucki v. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation & Correction

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided October 20, 2011No. 11AP-43PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bryant, Presiding Judge.

{¶ 1} Plaintiff-appellant, Anthony Lucki, appeals from a judgment of the Ohio Court of Claims dismissing his action against defendant-appellee, Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Correction, for lack of jurisdiction pursuant to the *110terms of R.C. 4117.10(A). Because the Court of Claims properly determined that it lacks jurisdiction over plaintiffs action, we affirm.

I. Facts and Procedural History

{¶ 2} At all times relevant to this appeal, plaintiff was employed as a corrections officer at the North Central Correctional Institution and was paid an hourly wage. The…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bush v. SpurlockOhio Supreme Court · 1989
  2. State ex rel. Clark v. Greater Cleveland Regional Transit AuthorityOhio Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Naylor v. Cardinal Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State ex rel. Ohio Ass'n of Public School Employees v. Batavia Local School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Streetsboro Education Ass'n v. Streetsboro City School District Board of EducationOhio Supreme Court · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Littleton v. Holmes Siding Contr.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2013
  2. State ex rel. Ohio Assn. of Pub. School Emps. v. Willoughby-Eastlake City School Dist.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2022
  3. United Elec. Radio & Mach. Workers of Am. v. Highland Local Sch. Dist. Bd. of Educ., Court of Appeals of Ohio, Fifth District, Morrow County2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API