Legal Opinion

Nash v. McNamara

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada

Decided May 7, 1906No. 835PublishedCited by 6 opinions

On Motion to Remand to State Court.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWDEY, .District Judge

(orally). The petition for removal in this case is on behalf of the Manhattan-Dexter Mining Company of Nevada, a corporation, and the Manhattan-Union Mining Company, a corporation. Both of said corporations were organized and existing under the laws of the state of South Dakota, and are therefore citizens and residents of said state. Many of the questions discussed by counsel are complicated in their nature and character; and it is questionable, to say the least, whether the views expressed by counsel for the plaintiffs in the court below, who petitioned the state court…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Fitzgerald v. Missouri Pac. Ry. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1891
  2. Houston & Texas Central Railway Co. v. ShirleySupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  3. Jefferson v. DriverSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Cable v. EllisSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  5. Speckert v. German Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hansen v. Pacific Coast Asphalt Cement Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1917
  2. Thomas v. Delta Land & Water Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1918
  3. Hill v. Woodland Amusement Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Delaware · 1908
  4. McCann v. Bentley Stores Corp.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1940
  5. Boykin, Sol. Gen. ex rel. Johnson v. Morris Fertilizer Co.District Court, N.D. Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API