Legal Opinion

Adoption of T.H. v. Perry

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 19, 1997No. 48A02-9611-CV-695PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

SULLIVAN, Judge.

Appellant, Stephen Hudson (Hudson) appeals the trial court’s September 17, 1996 order finding that Hudson had faded to communicate significantly with his son, T.H., for a period of a year or more and that therefore his consent was not required for T.H.’s adoption by Steven and Susan Perry (the Perrys) under I.C. 31-3-l-6(k)(l)(B) (Burns Code Ed. Cum.Supp.1996).

We affirm.

Hudson presents two issues for review.

1) Whether the trial court erred in determining that the one year period under I.C. 31-3-l-6(k)(l)(B) could include a period before which Hudson’s paternity of T.H.…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Adoption of JPIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  2. C.H. v. E.W.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In Re: The Adoption of T.W.: T.J. v. J.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013
  4. In the Adoption of B.R. F.R. v. J.B. and E.B.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API