Legal Opinion

United States v. George

District Court, D. Massachusetts

Decided June 15, 2006No. Crim. 95-10355-RCLPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF ERROR CORAM NOBIS

LINDSAY, District Judge.

I. Introduction

Before the court is a petition of Richard J. George (the “petitioner” or “George”) for the issuance of a writ of error coram nobis, pursuant to the All Writs Act, 28 U.S.C. § 1651(a). George claims that he is entitled to relief because his conviction was tainted by fundamental error, and he continues to suffer collateral consequences from an invalid conviction, in the form of terminated state pension benefits. The government opposes the petition on the grounds that there was no fundamental error…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. United States v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  3. United States v. BoylanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1990
  4. United States v. RybickiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. SerranoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  2. United States v. GeorgeDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2011
  3. Mala v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2010
  4. United States v. GeorgeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API