Legal Opinion

Staton v. Moody

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided December 16, 1952No. 34534, 34527Published

1Opinion of the Court

208 Okla. 372 (1952)

256 P.2d 409

STATON et al.

v.

MOODY et al. MOODY

v.

STATON et al.

Nos. 34534, 34527.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma.

December 16, 1952.

Rehearing Denied April 28, 1953.

W.H. Brown, Paul G. Darrough, and Virgil R. Ball, Oklahoma City, for Loreta Staton and others.

Rex H. Holden, W.T. Brunson, and Charles E. Dierker, Oklahoma City, for Bernice Opal Moody and others.

JOHNSON, J.

These two causes, No. 34534 and No. 34527, stem from a dispute as to the legal and proper disposition of the estate of Elizabeth Decker, deceased. No. 34527 was brought in the district court of Oklahoma county by…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olcott v. BynumSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
  2. Nelson v. SchoonoverSupreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  3. Leahy v. CheneySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1916
  4. Torgerson v. HaugeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Dudley v. DudleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1900

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API