Legal Opinion
United States v. Snellenberger
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided October 28, 2008No. 06-50169PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
548 F.3d 699 (2008)
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Michael Lee SNELLENBERGER, aka Michael Lee Cutter, Michael Lee Davidson, Robert Eugene Frehly, Cutter Snellenberger, "Cutter," Defendant-Appellant.
No. 06-50169.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted June 25, 2008.
Filed October 28, 2008.
Gail Ivens, Deputy Public Defender, Los Angeles, CA, for the defendant-appellant.
Anne C. Gannon, Assistant United States Attorney, Santa Ana, CA, and Michael J. Raphael, Assistant United States Attorney, Los Angeles, CA, for the plaintiff-appellee.
Steven F. Hubachek,…
Also in this document: Per curiam; Concurrence.
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Taylor v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Johnson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
- Shepard v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- James v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Jose Ruiz-Vidal v. Loretta E. LynchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015