Legal Opinion

Hilden v. Ball

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1990No. 17394Published

1Opinion of the Court

787 P.2d 1122 (1989)

117 Idaho 314

Rayola HILDEN, individually and as guardian ad litem for Jeremiah Hilden and Heather Hilden, minor children, Plaintiffs-appellants,

v.

Dr. James BALL, Defendant-Respondent.

No. 17394.

Supreme Court of Idaho.

May 22, 1989.

On Rehearing March 1, 1990.

Webb, Burton, Carlson, Pedersen & Webb, Twin Falls, for plaintiffs-appellants. Kenneth L. Pedersen argued.

Quane, Smith, Howard & Hull, Boise, for defendant-respondent. Andrew C. Brassey argued.

BAKES, Chief Justice.

Plaintiffs sued defendant, alleging medical malpractice in defendant's administration of anesthesia to Robert…

Also in this document: Concurrence; Dissent · Bistline; Dissent · Bistline.

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Quick v. CraneIdaho Supreme Court · 1986
  2. State v. AbbottAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
  3. Pocatello Industrial Park Co. v. Steel West, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 1980
  4. McBride v. Ford Motor Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1983
  5. Pilmer v. Boise Traction Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1908

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API