Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Barko Hydraulics, LLC v. Michael Shepherd

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 26, 2014No. 1121479Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBryan, Justice

I concur in all aspects of the main opinion except insofar as it reverses the judgment in its entirety and remands for a new trial. I would affirm the judgment as to liability, reverse the judgment as to damages, and remand for a new trial on the issue of damages only. See, e.g., LaFarge Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. Stribling, 880 So.2d 415 (Ala.2003).

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. LaFarge Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. StriblingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003