Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part
Barko Hydraulics, LLC v. Michael Shepherd
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided September 26, 2014No. 1121479Published
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partBryan, Justice
I concur in all aspects of the main opinion except insofar as it reverses the judgment in its entirety and remands for a new trial. I would affirm the judgment as to liability, reverse the judgment as to damages, and remand for a new trial on the issue of damages only. See, e.g., LaFarge Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. Stribling, 880 So.2d 415 (Ala.2003).
2Cases cited1 opinion
- LaFarge Bldg. Materials, Inc. v. StriblingSupreme Court of Alabama · 2003