Legal Opinion · Dissent

Rich v. Fidelity Trust Co.

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided June 18, 1964No. 19,926Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion.

Faulconer, P. J.

I dissent from the majority opinion because I do not feel that it is necessary to remand this cause to the trial court for clarification of the judgment.

If this court can determine from the record including the pleadings and the evidence and the judgment, taken as a whole, to whom the judgment applies, it is not uncertain.

The record in this case, and even the judgment it*248self, clearly shows to which defendant the judgment abating the action applies.

In my opinion the judgment here under consideration is readily distinguishable from that in the case of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. CLEAVENGER, ADMR. ETC. v. RuethIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Rich v. Fidelity Trust Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1964

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API