Legal Opinion

Agricultural Insurance Co. v. Dryden

Texas Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1965No. A-10786PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEAKLEY, Justice.

Henry Harold Dryden, Respondent, was injured on his way to work when his automobile turned over after a sudden swerve to avoid hitting a dog. The question to be decided is whether he was in the course of his employment at such time and hence entitled to workmen’s compensation benefits. The jury found that he was; the judgment of the trial court based thereon was affirmed by the Court of Civil Appeals, one Justice dissenting. 388 S.W.2d 455. We hold that under Section lb of Article 8309, Vernon’s Annotated Texas Civil Statutes, *746Dryden was not in the course of his employment…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Texas General Indemnity Company v. BottomTexas Supreme Court · 1963
  2. American General Insurance Co. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  3. Janak v. TEXAS EMPLOYERS'INSURANCE ASSOCIATIONTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  4. American General Insurance Co. v. ColemanTexas Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Jones v. Texas Indemnity Ins. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1949

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Meyer v. Western Fire Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Rose v. OdiorneCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1990
  3. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. ChesnutCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976
  4. Liberty Mutual Insurance Company v. PrestonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1966
  5. Texas Employers' Insurance Ass'n v. ByrdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1976

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API