Legal Opinion
Ahmad v. Naviwala
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided January 13, 2005PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Peters, J.E Appeals (1) from an order of the Family Court of Broome County (Ray, J.), entered April 23, 2003, which, in a proceeding pursuant to Family Ct Act article 6, partially granted petitioner’s motion for counsel fees, (2) from an order of said court, entered September 23, 2003, which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s motion for reconsideration, and (3) from an order of said court, entered May 18, 2004, which, inter alia, denied petitioner’s motion for a hearing on counsel fees and expenses.
The facts underlying this proceeding were fully reviewed by us in our previous decision (306 AD2d…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Morrissey v. MorrisseyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Daniels v. GuntertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Buono v. FantaconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Ahmad v. NaviwalaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2003
- Baker v. BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Hamilton v. MurphyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Bell v. WhiteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Meier v. Key-MeierAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Yarinsky v. YarinskyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- Williams v. Johnson Jr.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008